
Following Haiti's devastating earthquake on January 12th, I am puzzled and bewildered by certain happenings or non-happenings. The Dominican Republic shares the same land mass with Haiti and I have not heard any public announcement from Dominica's government offering assistance to their very close neighbor. Looking at the situation, it would seem to me that Dominican Republic would be the main source to channel aid to the desolate city. Where is their closest hospital to Haiti's capital? Can't the sick and wounded be transported there? We all know that this country's destruction will require world wide assistance, but you would think that Haiti's closest neighbor would be more proactive in offering immediate assistance to the earthquake victims. What about bulldozers and cranes to lift the rubble. Efforts should have been put in place the very next day (by the Dominican Republic's government) to get heavy equipment to the region to assist in the recovery efforts. I am just amazed that the Dominican Republic has remained so quiet in all of this. Even if you don't have ample monetary resources, offer your country and it's services to the United States as a means to channel in assistance to Haiti.
Its my understanding that Haiti is a make-up of rich and poor - no middle class. Port-Au- Prince (where the earthquake hit) is to the south of the country. I know that it is a poverty stricken country, but I can't imagine there are no other Supermarkets to the north of the country that could offer assistance the hard-hit capital city. Where are the wealthy Haitians in all of this? There seems to be such a huge class division in Haiti. We know classism and racism exist everywhere, but it seems to be on a whole other level there.
Second to Medical assistance, I believe tents should be at the top of Haiti's aid list. The people need some sort of roof over their heads and a sense of security. Tents and cots should be at the top of their list along with the food and water. I know many agencies and organizations are working very hard, but It is frustrating to many when it seems like the aid is not getting there fast enough.


Michelle Obama
Honestly, I am getting so sick of the sleeveless dresses. OK Michelle you made your point. You are not going to stop wearing sleeveless dresses just because some Republican on Fox news accused you of dressing down. However, most of your meetings and appearances are business like and as such, require business or formal attire. Your role is comparable to that of the Queen of England, so you can't just come out looking any "'ole" way. You always have to be prepared for the camera and - alas, the world. Yes, its a lot of pressure, but that is what you signed up for when you and the President started on the campaign trail.
Michelle Obama might be preoccupied with many things and her forte may not be fashion. Thats why I say, "GET A STYLIST." She is America's First Lady. That is the role of royalty. A Little makeup would not hurt either. Most people that are in front of the camera regularly are known to dab on a little powder or foundation, at the minimum - in order to achieve an even tone and to minimize shine. A little eye-liner would help erase that just- woke-up look as well.
Mrs. Obama has to get into this practice, even if she is just giving a News Reporter a tour of the White house. This is not just hostess as usual. You have to dress up for all most everything. Of course, I'm not talking about glamorous dressing, but a nice investment in business suites would simplify her dress and fashion dilemmas. I can't believe I'm actually saying this, but this is where she could take a cue from Gov. Palin. (Believe me - that was hard to write.) These she can use on a daily basis - some days will be business casual where she can throw on that famous sleeveless dress. Tie a sweater over the shoulder for a little more umph. For overseas and more formal events and functions she can get a little more glamorous as needs be.
Lets face it. For most appearances, President Obama is seen in a suite and tie - classic business wear for men. Michelle has to do the same. Think business - and dress for business. What if President Obama went and shook hands with other Presidents in front of countless flashing lights with a shirt without a tie. We would gasp!!. Michelle has a little bit more options as a woman, but if she feels she cannot wear an outfit to an important business meeting, she probably should not wear it to her daily events.
Take a break from the one trick pony and dress like the Royalty you are.

I'm sure most would agree that Michael Jackson is a hard one to figure out. Many questions and bewilderment bounces of the reflection of the man in the mirror. The biggest question being, "what is the reason behind his physical transformation?" The result of a rare skin disease or plastic surgery and bleaching of the skin? Plastic surgery on the nose is obvious, but Jackson insists that the skin coloration or lack thereof is a result of a rare skin disease.
It appears as if he was obsessed with being white. Even though, through his words he insisted that he loved being black, his actions were contrary. The people he loved and admired most (apart from family, I would imagine,) are white - Elizabeth Taylor, Lisa Presley, Brooke Shields. Yes, he may have loved Diana Ross and others, but his verbal admiration for the former three was more intense and worship-like. This, coupled with the report that he wanted his children to have blond hair and blue eyes, seems to suggest that he was infatuated with white features.
After being reminded of Jackson's enormous talent and learning more about his humanitarian side, it occurred to me that if indeed his children do not share his DNA, it would be sad that such a wonderful make up of a person would not be carried on in an offspring. Not to say talent cannot be taught and a good and kind personality cannot be formed from one's environment, but there is a lot to be said of natural talent and DNA traits. Personally , I don't believe, Michael's first two children share his DNA. Thats my opinion. Its not a professional conclusion and its not gospel. It's simply my opinion, based on obvious observation. This point of view has nothing to do with custody battle or anything of the sort. Michael is the father of those children - he raised them and his wishes should be carried out according to his will. I make the point about DNA, because it would be nice if such wonderful traits and unique musical talents were passed on to his offspring. And, maybe they were. Blanket, his third child have some of Michael's features. His beautiful large eyes resembles Michaels, especially when he was much younger. Blanket's slightly protruding cheekbones resemble Michael's as well. I say look out for that one!!!! Again my opinion - take it or leave it.
Its amazing that such great talent and such a complex mysterious person can be as equally shy and demur. Time and time again, we hear others describing him as sweet and gentle and "Pure." People that were very close to him always seem to use words such as innocent and naive to describe this otherwise, fabulous and unique larger-than-life phenomenon.
This simple complexity that surrounded Michael is all the more reason for study and discussion. I don't believe Michael hated black people - of course not; but I believe he was indoctrinated to believe that white was better than black and that white was close to sublime and he worshiped the thought of being white. I also believe that he was miserable and uncomfortable with his former features which changed over the years. This is totally based on his actions. Let me add that I am not against plastic surgery to achieve aesthetics; but some would argue that some of this former pictures were much more attractive than what became the result of multiple surgeries and the questionable extreme skin color change. Which leaves the question, what was he aiming for?
With all that Michael had to endure at an early age, I do believe he could have greatly benefited from Therapy. Maybe he did have a therapist, maybe he did not. I have not heard of any one coming forward to say he did. I believe that most celebrities that have to be in the limelight all the time and is under enormous scrutiny and pressure can greatly benefit from therapy. Instead many seem to believe that popping a pill is easier and that it eases the pain quicker.
Michael Jackson - a simple complexity. They say still waters run deep!!

Rihanna
Yes we were all shocked that Rihanna went back to Chris Brown so quickly after their incident which led to Rihanna's hospital visit. Many were shocked that she went back to him at all and everyone seems to be chanting, "Leave him, leave him." We know that that is easier said than done. Who are we to be judging her and to be giving unsolicited advice?
One thing I've learned to do is never tell a friend that they should leave their guy or spouse. I would give advice like, "one person cannot be in a marriage or it takes two to tango," but as we all know no matter what advice they receive the person going through stuff will have to make that decision for themselves. Affairs of the heart are not simple to explain.
Many of us that are chanting "Leave him" might be in abusing relationships of our own. It might not be physical abuse, but emotional abuse that we stay and take. Some of us are in loveless relationships and are just too afraid to leave. We need to back off and give Rihanna her space and let her figure out stuff for herself. I do believe that one day she will look at those pictures (that were taken at the time of the incident) and come to the realization that she does not need to be with that person. She has to get to that place herself before she can ever leave him. In the meantime lets remember she is a victim and give her some support and empathy.
By the way, I play and enjoy her music all the time.

Movado
Many try to copy the sounds of reggae and dancehall music. Even Hispanics have adopted the dancehall music and chants, and while they do a decent job, they can never imitate the soulful, deep harsh sounds from dancehall Kings like Beenie Man, Buju Banton and Movado. Their sounds come from a deep place - the pain and the grit of the street and thug life. Movado is able to create such a unique sound. It seems everything he touches turns to gold because of the passion and pain that spills out from the guts of his stomach onto the vinyl or CD.
You can hear it when he cries out to God to protect him from those who might want to harm him or bring him down in "I'm on the rock." This passion can never be imitated, because its his pain, his passion, his story. Amazing Grace is so hard to listen to as it depicts hard core street life (and how he managed to survive it.) His most recent "So Special" chart buster is as sweet as it is rough; Not to mention the dances that have been invented to go along with his winning hits. The gully creep might have emerged from this thug life - hiding out from whomever - maybe the helicopter shining bright lights "a-groun". All I know is the dance just fits the rythm and the lyrics just so. Of course, everyone puts their own unique spin on it and that makes it even more beautiful.
Many of us have a love/hate relationship with dancehall music, because, while we do not condone or encourage the gangster lifestyle, the compilation and delivery of the lyrics and rhythms are so magnetic its hard to resist. Many leaders have lashed out against artists like Movado, saying that the lyrics in their songs might negatively influence the youths. Large sponsors have banned big concert events because of them. These artists sing about what they know, and you have to give most of them credit for their belief in God and his grace. Movado, while he sings and chants about street life, he always seem to manage to give reverence to God. You have to give him and other artists credit for that. This is one main difference that I find between (Jamaican) dancehall artists and rap artist, they always include, Jah or God in their lyrics.
The good thing is - its a way out of the street life, when they are able to succeed in the business.

Just recently in California, a man killed his entire family and himself after he and his wife lost their jobs. Instead of buckling belts and cutting back, he made the decision to not go on. The question is - was pride the reason for his actions? It was reported that they were fired subsequent to the falsification of company documents. They were trying to get child care assistance for their 5 children. After being fired, they removed the children from their schools with the explanation that they were moving to another state. The children were out of school for two weeks prior to the killings.
Some believe that the act of withdrawing the children from school was an effort to save face after the dismal from their jobs. Thats one thing, but was it also pride that prevented these parents from joining the food stamp line or moving to a smaller home or taking a less attractive job just to make ends meet?
Many people feel like they have to maintain a certain lifestyle in order to impress others. With the economy the way it is, people have to ask themselves if push comes to shove will they be able to downsize, or will they melt from the pressure of trying to keep up with the Joneses Newsflash - the Joneses are probably taking less atractive jobs or staying in a much smaller home themselves.
It was just reported during a newscast that the wealthy are not splurging like they used to. Lavishness and big spending have now become associated with shame. New York's upper crusts are no longer splurging on expensive art, nor are they flying in the private jets as they used to. Its not so much that they can't afford to - its more the guilt associated with the indulgence as the middle class continues to struggle.
Do you believe the California family tragedy was a result of too much pride or just hopelessness?

In one of my earlier blogs, I wrote about how it defies common sense to practice certain religious rituals in different denominations. I should have ended that blog by stating it also defies common sense to be an Atheist. Since I did not, I will give the topic its own blog.
All one has to do is look around them. Look up at the stars, the sun and the moon to realize that there is some being greater than us. Are men responsible for how the earth turns and how the moon and sun revolves around the earth? Do men tell the bees to pollinate the flowers? Do men tell the body to store fat for future energy when you don't eat for a long time. Is it man, that go in and turn the baby around in the mothers womb as it gets ready to be born. No, all of this gets done amazingly, on its own, in sync and timely. Isn't that beautiful. And you say there is no God?
The bible says, only a fool says in his heart there is no God. All you have to do is look at the amazement of how certain things work on their own; Look at the ocean and the mountains. I remember watching a TV Church service some time ago, where this lady was testifying about how she changed from being an Atheist to a believer. When she witnessed the birth of a baby, in all of its amazement, she became a believer.
One has to be really arrogant, and ignorantly so, to think that they are it - that there is nothing or no one greater than them. It just defies common, common sense. Someone called a radio show recently belittling the word God, by saying that when it is spelled backwards it is dog. They said it's just another word and it has no meaning to it. Well let me give you my connection between God and dog. Dog was created to serve man and man was created to serve God. How about that as an epiphany!! I remember watching a small part of the dog whisperer, and he was telling the dog's owner that the dog wants to be your servant, they like commands and wants you to be their master, that is why they act out at times. Dogs want to serve their masters. Turn that around - men should serve God. That is the connection my friend.
All God asks us to do is believe and the rest will be revealed. Some scholars spend all their time reading and trying to find or not find some evidence of God. They are missing the boat completely. Others are trying to reduce god to their level, in trying to understand it all. You probably won't ever understand it all, but I believe that if one believes and opens their heart, little by little god's glory will be revealed to them.
Can I get an Amen?

Barack Obama flanked by SS Men
I watched today as President-Elect Barack Obama made his way through the crowds in Delaware and Baltimore - two stops on his way to the White House in Washington D.C. Even though he was in a mostly black crowd, and, of course, he and his wife are black, the Secret Service men that were assigned to protect him stuck out like sore thumbs.
The whole purpose of the "secret" service men is for them to blend into the crowd and be inconspicuous as the President makes his way through crowds or attends his engagements. Well, as the President-Elect and his wife made their way through the crowds, there were three to five pink heads surrounding his back. I have to say it was a little amusing. Now, I don't mean to be disrespectful to the Secret Service men when I say pink heads, but I am trying to paint a graphic picture.
I am not sure what branch the Secret Service men emerge from - the CIA or the FBI, but I am sure both organizations have black men . I am sure the men assigned to the soon to be President are the very best as I observed them being extremely intense as they watched the crowd for anything suspicious; But a note to whomever is in charge of assigning protection for the President, please get some African-American Secret Service men, who can blend in and not be so conspicuous. Better yet, get a diverse number of men and/or women.
(Written on 01/17/08)

Federal Budget Deficit Chart
The title of this blog could very well have been "Thirsty for Blood - Thirsty for Oil." Recently the President was interviewed by one of ABC's journalists regarding his faith. One's spiritual belief is personal, and we have to take him at his word when he talks about his relationship with God. However, his actions and decisions do not align with someone with a deep spiritual relationship with God. In the Bible it is mentioned that when you give to the poor, the sick and the under served you give to God. In other words, being compassionate to the under-served is one of the basic ways to serve God.
Bush's tax breaks have always been geared toward the wealthy. Under his Administration, many after school programs, aimed at keeping at-risk students off the streets, were terminated . There were no major programs that were installed under his administration that were geared toward the poor and the rehabilitation of those who needed to get back on their feet. There were no true indication of compassion toward the poor, needy or under served. This should be the main focus of government. With Special Interests Lobbyists and greed this has switched around to the government serving the rich.
Lets not forget Hurricane Katrina. Government dragged their feet to get help to thousands of stranded folks along the gulf coast who did not have the means to get themselves out of harm's way. Again, the poor were ignored for days and left behind. Its reported that people are still reeling from the effects of being displaced by Hurricane Katrina, with little or slow help from the government.
Of course, the war in Iraq will be one of Bush's main presidential legacies; A war he thought would be over in a couple of weeks. To his dismay, the Iraqis fought back. In the meantime, thousands of civilians died and billions and billions of dollars were and is still being spent - to pay American Contractors. Wait a minute, does this statement sound familiar - "If someone is bombing your country don't you have the right to defend yourself?" This is being asked in defense of the Israelis attacking the Palestinians. So, didn't they expect Iraqis to fight back in the same notion? Outsiders were bombing their country and their oil fields were threatened to be taken away from them. (By the way, Iraq was not an eminent threat to the U.S.)
There are statements made that the US was not attacked since 9/11 - therefore the President must have done a good job keeping terrorists away. Well, the US was not attacked prior to 9/11 (since Pearl Harbor) either, so in the same breathe, one could say the Bush Administration did not do a good job keeping America safe, since it happened under his watch.


I hope I don't sound like an old fowl, when I say I'm not really into texting. How annoying is it when you are trying to drive and read a text message. Just call me - that way I can keep my eyes on the road, while I'm talking to you. When someone is into texting, it really says a lot about their age, lifestyle and generation category. Can you imagine being slightly tipsy and trying to read a text on top of it; then trying to respond (while driving?) This is not a good idea. Please do not ever do this. I finally gave up and responded with a call back. I don't get it!! It takes that much longer to type out a sentence, than just speaking the words.
Most of my friends and peers do not text; Maybe once in a while, if we are trying to be hip. So, when this new acquaintance of mine just kept texting, I said wait a minute - How old is this guy anyway?!!! He must have asked the same question of me when I insisted on calling instead of texting. (LOL)
Seriously though, especially when driving, its best not to be on the phone at all. If you have to be on the phone, its better to just talk - even better - hands free with the phone on speaker. I say, wait until you reach your destination, but if you have to respond to a call really quickly call instead of text. Of course, if you are not driving - by all means, knock yourself out and put those thumbs to work. I must admit, texting does have it's place though, especially if the topic is a little awkward and you don't necessarily want to have a verbal discussion about it.
OMG - I can't believe it. I am a talker not a texter - Am I old-fashioned??? I don't think so!!!!
Are you a talker or a texter?

Angy Iraquis
By now you have had numerous discussions about the infamous (or famous) hurling shoe - the shoe that was thrown at the President. I want to know if you think its ok to laugh at the incident. A shoe being hurled in mid air is just hilarious to me (if no one gets hurt in the process of course.) However, its seems some take offense to people having a good laugh at the matter. Take away the President from the equation for a minute, would you laugh then? However, in all honesty the President being the target, combined with him ducking adds to the craziness of this picture. I guess it all depends on how you feel about the person on the receiving end. Some Hispanics who were scowling at the fact that people were laughing at the incident, would probably do the same if it were Castro instead of Bush on the receiving end. If it were done to Obama for instance, it would probably be seen as a hate crime There are many facets to this incident - some humorous and some not so humorous.
Anyway, to Bush's credit he made light of the situation, which is even more reason why its ok to chuckle or have a good hearty laugh about it. The second part of the story is the security issue. From what I understand about secret service men, their main purpose is to protect the president and keep him out of harm's way. If there is an incident, their initial response is to cover the president (or whomever they are protecting) and remove him from the harmful environment. There was a secret service man that approached the president, but he brushed him off with an "I'm ok" gesture. Its not practical to have secret service men in every row of every audience, especially at a news conference. They would more likely be close to him to cover him and remove him from any potential harm.
Last but not least, is the message behind the hurling shoe, which is not so funny at all. This was a representation of how many Iraqis feel about Bush and his Administration. They hold him in very low regard. They have little or no respect for him and their feelings border on loathing. The Journalist is now seen as a hero by many in that country. What is sad is the president's comments, "I don't know what his beef is." If you think the Governor of Illinois suffer from narcissism, take another look. It seems he feels he has done nothing, and can't do any, wrong.
Some might take offense to people laughing at this incident, but I say, better we laugh about this, than be sad or shocked about something that could have been worse.


OJ Simpson at Recent Trial
It seems the same reason why some say OJ should have laid low is the very same reason he kept tempting his fate. O. J. Simpson was acquitted on double murder charges over ten years ago. The evidence seemed to have been stacked against him. Even though his Lawyers were able to get the jury to acquit him, many whispered that they knew OJ did it. If OJ really committed these crimes and he got away with them, this seems to have made him feel indispensable.He probably felt that he could walk on water. Add to this, he was already a mega star and had many fans. No one can get him now!!!!!! With this disposition, he seemed to keep pushing the envelope.
Writing his book "if I DID IT," was what cracked the camel's back - no it did not quiet brake it, but he sure came close to the edge. Many comedians used OJ's acquittal as part of their material, making comments like we know he did it!!! Earth to OJ - just because others whispered he did it, doesn't mean you should do the same. The book and the title was a bad, bad joke. The rule, OJ, is that you cannot be charged for Murder twice, not "they cannot charge me for anything again, and I am indispensable."
The other part of this whole ordeal is knowing the people who you hang around with. They say keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Maybe it should be the other way around, since you kind of already know that the enemies don't have your best interest at heart. Bob Marley's lyrics say, "Only your friends know your secret, so only he can reveal it........" It seems like OJ's friends really blind sided him, with this quest to recover his stolen items. Many say he was set up, why else tape the ambush. Wow, how could he have known they were out to get him? And, got him they did.
OJ should have been extra cautious , knowing his alleged victims' family were out for blood (revenge - justice?)

Clinton/Obama on the Same Team
So, Senator Biden and Senator Clinton were once President Elect Obama's competitors at one point. This does not mean they cannot merge for the common good of the people. The media keeps making the comment that these individuals chosen to serve on Obama's team were once his opponents and they made certain remarks while on the campaign trail. Senator Biden made comments that Senator Obama was not ready to be President and Senator Clinton ran an ad suggesting that Obama was not prepared to take a 3:00AM call about a possible security issue. Well now Mr. Obama can take that call and pass it on to Senator - soon to be Secretary of State - Clinton - Its all good!!!!
Big corporations merge with their competitors all the time. They come together and discuss what's in everyone's best interest. The result is a win-win for all. Of course this comes with a lot of skillful negotiations and everyone has their own agenda. The trick is to highlight what you are giving up or giving to the other party, as opposed to what you what to receive.
So what if they bad-talked each other during the campaign? The important thing is putting together a skillful, experienced and diplomatic team, that the president-elect knows will represent him well. He will have to call on them for advice and solutions. He knows he cannot make all the decisions himself so its in his best interest to appoint the best, even if they fought in the past. its just business!!!

I finally found out last year what makes a good Turkey - The gravy. I made the gravy from scratch last year (no store bought packets of powder) and I was scared of myself. It came out so great, it dawned on me that that was what made a good thanksgiving turkey dinner.
Many people from the Caribbean that live in America, find the turkey intimidating and adding to that, its not a dinner that we have a lot of practice in preparing; so many just avoid cooking it. Some take part in the Thanksgiving Turkey tradition, but put their native spin on it by jerking turkey legs. They ask the butcher to slice up the turkey legs (like oxtail) then they either jerk them or bar-b-que them. So these folks are doing as the Romans do, but they put their own spin on it. Others roast the entire turkey, but with jerk seasoning, or some other type of Jamaican seasoning. These folks are getting even closer to participating in the real tradition.
I would encourage yo to go ahead and try doing the Turkey, the traditional way - gravy and all. If a large turkey is too intimidating, use a small (young) turkey. Its a little bigger than a large chicken roaster. Many of us, use the drippings from the roasted turkey as gravy. That is mostly oil, and even though it has a lot of flavor that is not real gravy. Try this. Start with about one-half to one stick of butter and about two to three table spoons of flour and sauté these over low heat, stirring constantly. Add to this, one half to one cup of chicken broth and continue to stir over medium heat. Add to this, about one half cup - two thirds cup of the turkey drippings and continue to simmer over low heat for about 20 minutes. This my friends is real turkey gravy. Try it and turkey will no longer be intimidating to cook.
I recommend seasoning the turkey over night as well. Whatever seasoning you decide to use, try getting it under the skin of the breast, and then all over and inside of the turkey. Let is sit over night and your turkey will have lots of flavor. Remember to baste frequently to avoid drying the meat out.
When the turkey is done, slice and cover with real gravy.
Happy Thanksgiving!!!!


